International Journal of Mechatronics, Robotics, and Artificial Intelligence
Login
IJMRAI
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Early Access
    • Latest Issue
    • All Issues
  • Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Guide for Authors
    • Authorship
    • Article Processing Charges (APC)
    • Proofreading Service
  • Reviewers
    • Guide for Reviewers
    • Become a Reviewer
  • About
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Team
    • Journal Insights
    • Peer Review Process
    • Publication Ethics
    • Plagiarism
    • Allegations of Misconduct
    • Appeals and Complaints
    • Corrections and Withdrawals
    • Copyright Policy
    • Open Access
    • Archiving Policy
    • Abstracting and indexing
    • Announcements
    • Contact

Search Results for RLC Circuits

Article
Second Derivative General Linear Methods for Transient Analysis: A Robust Approach to Damped RLC Circuits Across Damping Conditions

Noor AbdulHassan, Ali Kadhim

Pages: 88-93

PDF Full Text
Abstract

Transient analysis of an electrical circuit is an important study in determining how electric circuits respond dynamically due to sudden changes, such as switching operations. The parallel RLC circuit has become crucial, both in academics and engineering fields, pertaining to designing various engineering devices: oscillators, filters, and dissipating energy that might be harmful to people or electronics. This paper examines the application of Second Derivative General Linear Methods (SGLMs) for solving the governing second-order ordinary differential equation of a damped parallel RLC circuit. SGLMs with second derivative have given with superior stability and accuracy for non-stiff and stiff systems. This study compared the given methods with other traditional methods under the conditions: as overdamped, critically damped, and underdamped. Results will find wide implications in design and optimization studies of electrical systems by providing a robust framework for accurate, efficient transient analysis. The results show that SGLMs achieved significantly lower absolute errors compared to classical methods. Specifically, the maximum error across all simulations was over 10 times smaller than that of RK4 (Runge-Kutta 4), and the Euler method exhibited even greater deviations. SGLMs remained stable even at larger step sizes (up to h=0.1)where the other methods either became unstable or lost accuracy.

1 - 1 of 1 items

Search Parameters

×

The submission system is temporarily under maintenance. Please send your manuscripts to

Go to Editorial Manager
Journal Logo
International Journal of Mechatronics, Robotics, and Artificial Intelligence

College of Engineering | University of Basrah

  • Copyright Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Cookie Settings
Licensing & Open Access

CC BY NC 4.0 Logo Licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0

This journal provides immediate open access to its content.

Editorial Manager Logo Elsevier Logo

Peer-review powered by Elsevier’s Editorial Manager®

Copyright © 2026 The Authors