Cover
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025)

Published: June 30, 2025

Pages: 11-19

Original Article

Interdisciplinary Approaches to Smart City Development: Integrating Engineering, Urban Planning, and Social Sciences with AI and Cybersecurity Governance

Abstract

Smart cities represent a nexus where urban planning, engineering, digital technologies, and societal needs converge. In emerging economies such as Iraq, conventional top-down smart city models often fail to account for contextual realities, resulting in fragmented or unsustainable initiatives. This paper proposes a novel interdisciplinary smart city development framework that integrates Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based planning, engineering simulations, urban design heuristics, and insights from social sciences particularly those related to digital inclusion and governance. Leveraging publicly available datasets and simulation environments, we demonstrate that the proposed approach can reduce urban traffic congestion by up to 35%, improve equitable access to public services by over 30%, forecast energy demands with more than 85% accuracy, and detect cyber threats with a precision and recall of 85.7%. These results validate the feasibility of a modular, adaptable smart city blueprint that embeds cybersecurity and data governance principles from the outset offering a scalable alternative suited to the institutional and infrastructural realities of developing contexts like Iraq.

References

  1. United Nations, “World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision,” Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, NY, USA, 2018, https://population.un.org/wup/assets/WUP2018-Report.pdf
  2. H. Chourabi, T. Nam, and S. Walker, “Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework,” in Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, 2012, pp. 2289–2297, doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.615
  3. N. Komninos, Smart Cities and Connected Intelligence. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2014.
  4. A. Albino, U. Berardi, and R. M. Dangelico, “Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives,” Journal of Urban Technology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 3–21, 2015, doi: 10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
  5. N. K. Al-Rikabi, and M. Ali, "The Social Dimension and Its Role in the Applicability of Smart Cities in Iraq," IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing, vol. 518. no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/518/2/022069
  6. S. Kitchin, “The Real-Time City? Big Data and Smart Urbanism,” GeoJournal, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
  7. M. Shelton, M. Zook, and M. Wiig, “The ‘Actually Existing Smart City,” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 13–25, 2015, doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsu026
  8. A. Cavoukian, “Privacy by Design in the Age of Big Data,” Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, 2013.
  9. T. Allam and Z. Dhunny, “On Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Smart Cities,” Cities, vol. 89, pp. 80–91, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.032
  10. R. Giffinger, R. Kalasek, C. Fertner, N. P. Milanović, H. Kramar, and E. Meijers, “Smart Cities: Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities,” Vienna University of Technology, 2007.
  11. M. Batty, K. W. Axhausen, F. Giannotti, A. Pozdonoukhov, A. Bazzani, M. Wachowicz, G. Ouzounis, and Y. Portugali, “Smart Cities of the Future,” European Physical Journal Special Topics, vol. 214, pp. 481–518, 2012.
  12. M. Zaharia , R. Xin, P. Wendell, T. Das, M. Armbrust, A, Dave, X. Meng, J. Rosen, S. Venkataraman, M. J. Franklin, A. Ghodsi, J. E. González, S. J. Shenker, I. Stoica, “Apache Spark: A Unified Engine for Big Data Processing,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 56–65, 2016.
  13. J. Zhang et al., “Deep Learning in Smart Cities: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 68–75, 2017.
  14. P. Waddell, “UrbanSim: Modeling Urban Development for Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Planning,” Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 297–314, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208976274
  15. B. Silva, E. Oliveira, and E. Costa, “A Smart City Framework Using Open Data: Toward Citizen-Centric Services,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 9, p. 3100, 2018.
  16. Y. Xu, L. Zhang, and X. Wang, “Data-Driven Urban Planning Using Open Geospatial Data,” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 9, no. 12, p. 708, 2020.
  17. D. Kumar and A. Sharma, “Cybersecurity Frameworks in Smart Cities: Challenges and Future Directions,” Computers & Security, vol. 87, 2020.
  18. MITRE, “ATT&CK: Adversarial Tactics, Techniques, and Common Knowledge,” [Online]. Available: https://attack.mitre.org.
  19. M. Al-Rubaie and J. M. Chang, “Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning: Threats and Solutions,” IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 49–58, 2019, doi: 10.1109/MSEC.2018.2888775
  20. C. Dwork and A. Roth, “The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy,” Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 9, no. 3–4, pp. 211–407, 2014, doi: 10.1561/0400000042
  21. S. Graham and S. Marvin, Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203452202
  22. T. N. Abbas, A. A. Abbas, S. A. Jamil, and Y. Krasylnyk, "Empowering iraqi citizens through digital transformation: a legal perspective on e-government services," Encuentros. Revista de Ciencias Humanas, Teoría Social y Pensamiento Crítico, pp. 344-362, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13732428
  23. A. Townsend, Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. New York, NY: W.W. Norton, 2013.
  24. ISO 37120: Sustainable Cities and Communities—Indicators for City Services and Quality of Life, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
  25. ISO/IEC 30182: Smart City Concept Model, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
  26. OpenStreetMap Foundation, “OpenStreetMap Data,” [Online]. Available: https://www.openstreetmap.org
  27. European Space Agency, “Copernicus Open Access Hub,” [Online]. Available: https://scihub.copernicus.eu
  28. WorldPop Project, “High-Resolution Population Data,” [Online]. Available: https://www.worldpop.org
  29. Google, “Google Earth Engine,” [Online]. Available: https://earthengine.google.com.
  30. K. Nagel and M. Balmer, “MATSim: Agent-Based Modeling for Transportation Planning,” in Handbook of Transport Simulation, Emerald, 2010, pp. 57–78, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-226-8.ch003
  31. D. Zhong, and A. Boukerche, "Traffic signal control using deep reinforcement learning with multiple resources of rewards," Proceedings of the 16th ACM international symposium on performance evaluation of wireless Ad Hoc, sensor, & ubiquitous networks, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3345860.3361522
  32. M. Ester, H. Kriegel, J. Sander, and X. Xu, “A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise,” in Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1996, pp. 226–231.
  33. L. Breiman, “Random Forests,” Machine Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2001, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
  34. NIST, “Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity,” Version 1.1, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2018. [35] W. Reisig, Understanding Petri Nets: Modeling Techniques, Analysis Methods, Case Studies. Springer, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-018-9619-0
  35. H. A. Abbass, “Social Integration of Artificial Intelligence: Functions, Automation Allocation Logic and Human-Autonomy Trust,” Cognitive Computation, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 159–171, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-018-9619-0
  36. M. Adamowicz and M. Zwolińska-Ligaj, “The ‘Smart Village’ as a Way to Achieve Sustainable Development in Rural Areas of Poland,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 16, p. 6503, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166503